Early Neutral Evaluation

Share This
« Back to Glossary Index
Categories: Dispute Resolution

Early Neutral Evaluation

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a process used in civil litigation where a neutral third party, often an experienced attorney or retired judge, assesses the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s case early in the dispute. The primary purpose of ENE is to facilitate a more informed negotiation process and potentially expedite a resolution before the matter escalates to trial.

ENE typically occurs shortly after a lawsuit has been filed, providing parties with an unbiased perspective on the merits of their claims and defenses. This evaluation can help both sides understand the potential risks involved in continuing litigation, encourage settlement discussions, and lead to more constructive conversations about resolving the dispute amicably.

The process generally involves the following steps:

  1. Selection of the Evaluator: Both parties agree on a neutral evaluator with expertise relevant to the case.

  2. Preparation: Each party submits a brief written statement outlining their position, key facts, and any relevant evidence, which helps the evaluator understand the issues at hand.

  3. Evaluation Meeting: In a confidential session, the evaluator reviews the submitted materials and conducts a meeting where each party can present their arguments. The evaluator may ask questions to clarify any points.

  4. Feedback: After considering the information presented, the evaluator provides their assessment, including an opinion on the likely outcome if the case goes to trial. This feedback is non-binding, meaning it does not dictate the resolution but informs the parties’ decision-making.

  5. Settlement Discussions: Following the evaluation, parties can engage in settlement negotiations armed with a clearer understanding of their positions and the potential implications of continuing litigation.

ENE can be an effective tool in reducing litigation costs and time, as it often leads to earlier resolutions. Its confidential nature encourages open communication, allowing parties to explore settlement options without the fear of prejudicing their case if negotiations fail.

« Back to Glossary Index