Neutral Arbitrator Selection
Neutral arbitrator selection is the process of choosing an impartial third party to resolve a dispute through arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that avoids court litigation. The selected arbitrator is responsible for hearing the evidence, making legal determinations, and issuing a binding decision based on the merits of the case.
The process typically begins with both parties agreeing upon a method for selecting the arbitrator. This can involve several approaches, including:
-
Mutual Agreement: Both parties may agree on a specific individual to serve as the arbitrator. This is often ideal as it ensures that both parties have confidence in the chosen arbitrator’s neutrality and expertise.
-
Arbitration Institutions: Parties can opt to use established arbitration organizations, such as the American Arbitration Association (AAA) or the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). These institutions often have their own rules and lists of qualified arbitrators, providing a streamlined selection process.
-
Striking Method: In some cases, each party may provide a list of acceptable arbitrators, and they may take turns striking names from the list until one remains, ensuring a neutral selection.
-
Third-Party Selection: If the parties cannot agree, they may choose to have a neutral third party (often suggested by an ADR provider) select the arbitrator from a list of qualified candidates.
The qualifications of an arbitrator can vary based on the nature of the dispute. For instance, if the arbitration involves complex commercial issues, the parties may prefer an arbitrator with specific expertise in business law or finance. The goal is to ensure that the arbitrator is unbiased and capable of fairly adjudicating the issues at hand.
In essence, neutral arbitrator selection is a critical step in the arbitration process, as it directly affects the fairness and outcome of the dispute resolution. A well-chosen arbitrator can lead to a more efficient and agreeable resolution, while a poorly chosen one may result in additional disputes regarding the arbitration process itself.
« Back to Glossary Index