Appellate Arbitration Review
In the context of legal proceedings, Appellate Arbitration Review refers to a process in which a higher court reviews the decision made by an arbitrator or an arbitration panel. This process is generally limited in scope, focusing on whether the arbitration was conducted in accordance with the law and whether the arbitrator(s) acted within their authority.
The Appellate Arbitration Review typically considers several factors:
-
Jurisdiction: The reviewing court must determine if it has the authority to review the arbitration decision, which usually depends on the arbitration agreement and relevant statutes.
-
Procedural Fairness: The review examines whether the arbitration process followed proper procedures, including giving both parties a fair opportunity to present their cases.
-
Substantive Review: Courts will often not re-evaluate the merits of the case but may review whether the arbitrator’s decision violated public policy, was arbitrary, or exceeded the powers granted in the arbitration agreement.
-
Grounds for Appeal: Common grounds for appealing an arbitration award include evident partiality by the arbitrator, misconduct, failure to make a mutual, final, and definite award, or any other reason that justifies vacating the award under the applicable arbitration statutes.
For example, if two parties agree to arbitrate their dispute regarding a contract and the arbitrator rules in favor of one party, the losing party may request an Appellate Arbitration Review if they believe the arbitrator showed bias or ignored critical evidence. However, the court’s role is not to weigh the evidence anew but to ensure the arbitration process was fair and lawful.
« Back to Glossary Index